A courtroom was left stunned this week as a man filed a lawsuit against a dentist he said he “trusted like family,” claiming a series of botched procedures left him with no teeth at all.
The plaintiff, identified as 42-year-old Martin Hale, told the court he originally visited the dentist for a simple set of fillings. But according to him, the appointments spiraled into multiple extractions, complications, and follow-ups — until he was left “practically toothless.”
“I went in with a toothache,” Hale said during testimony. “I came out looking like I’d bitten a grenade.”
He told the judge he trusted the dentist for years, saying he’d always believed he was in “safe hands.” But after the last procedure, Hale claimed the dentist told him the remaining teeth were “unsalvageable,” something Hale insists was never explained before.
The lawsuit alleges negligence, lack of informed consent, and “permanent lifestyle damage,” with Hale arguing he now struggles to eat solid food, smile in public, or feel confident around others.
The dentist — Dr. Leonard Frazier, who maintains his innocence — argued through his attorney that each extraction was medically necessary and that Hale had “severe, long-term dental decay” caused by neglect.
“Every step taken was to protect the patient’s health,” the attorney stated. “No procedure was performed without explanation.”
The courtroom grew tense as Hale removed his dentures, telling the court, “This is what trusting the wrong person gets you.”
The judge has yet to issue a ruling, but the case has already sparked discussion online about patient rights, informed consent, and the importance of second opinions.
As one commenter posted, “Imagine going to fix one tooth and walking out with zero. That’s every dentist nightmare story rolled into one.”
About the Author
